Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX
