Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano 19 Stella 30000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.8:1). While Shimano 19 Stella 30000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 19 Stella?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
