Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa BG 4000X

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa BG
Spinning
69.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.79 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €108.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa BG 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs, while Daiwa BG 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa BG?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Daiwa BG 4000X
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
