Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
