Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a weight of 250g / 8,82oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
