Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (180g / 6,35oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
