Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Exceler LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
