Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a weight of 520g / 18,34oz, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
