Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Beastmaster
