Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 1000 R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Shimano Sahara 1000 R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 1000 R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
