Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
