Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
