Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
