Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
