Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
