Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX
