Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €420.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 20/270

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Shimano Talica II 10IIX and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Talica II 10IIX offers a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a gear ratio of 4.0:1/1.5:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Shimano Talica II 10IIX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.13 out of 10 (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- A gear ratio of 4.0:1/1.5:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
