Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
