Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €58.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.89 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 185g / 6,53oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 20 Legalis LT?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
