Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin RAYA body
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin RAYA body, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Delphin RAYA body may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin RAYA body?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin RAYA body
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
