Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin SHARX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
