Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
