Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX
