Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
