Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000SDHA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Vanford FA?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
