Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6.61oz), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
