Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Delphin RAYA body
