Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
