Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
