Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX edges out Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.42 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X
