Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa BG
Spinning
57.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.82 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight640g / 22.58oz
Line retireve per crank120 centimeter / 47.24 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €115.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/430
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa BG 5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa BG 5000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 5000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
