Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
