Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
