Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
