Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
