Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
