Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
