Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
