Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT
Spinning
59.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 20 Laguna LT?
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
