Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
