Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
55.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
