Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
