Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin RAYA body
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Delphin RAYA body
Feeder And Match
44.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.63 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight584g / 20.6oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size55 Y
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/400
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin RAYA body, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Delphin RAYA body may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin RAYA body?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin RAYA body
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
