Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
