Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
