Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Exsence?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
