Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
