Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
88.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
