Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
