Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.6 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
