Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
