Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
