Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX